HelpWeekly Assignments
ITEDU 510: Technology: Use & Assessment, Spring, 2009
Modules | Breeze Meeting Room
Weeks: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5&6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
To update this page, click Refresh or Reload on your browser now.

If you have difficulty accessing any of the readings, or if you have questions on these assignments, send an Email to the instructor.

Final Session: Monday, 5/4/09
Farewell

Friends,

I would like to express my thanks to each of you for all of your contributions to our class. I consider it an honor to have had the opportunity to work with each of you.

Things were not always smooth, but you managed to succeed. There were too many surveys from me, an ill-structured technology assessment activity, and some frustration along the way. But there was also some fascinating conversation, and I've read some great suggestions for addressing the connection between technology and childhood obesity. Though I wonder how many of us will now bring the issue forward to local (or other) decision makers. This was an academic exercise, but it needn't stop there. Actually taking action is a logical next step.

I have finished grading, and have sent each of you an Email noting your grade. Please let me know immediately if there are any errors or if you did not receive that Email. Do not visit old quizzes just to look at them, because you'll erase the previous score.

Be sure to download a copy of your individual and team work to your own storage device. Make sure it works. If you have work posted on another's account, you will have no control over it later.

Be sure to visit the Final Forum and say goodbye to your classmates. (This will be open until this Friday, May 8th, after which time our Blackboard forum and modules may be closed. I will be leaving town on May 7th, however, and I'll have only limited if any Internet connectivity after May 6th.) Tell us your summer plans. Is anybody graduating? Any new jobs lined up? Let's leave ITEDU 510 with a final goodbye in that forum.

Again, thank you very much. I wish you the best. Let me know if I can be of service in the future.

Take care,

Jim


Week 15: Monday, 4/27/09 - Friday, 5/1/09
1. Check Out Other Teams' Reports

Have you seen the other team's reports? You are invited to read and comment on them, or on yours (and these comments will not influence grades.) Use the "Reflecting on the Technology Assessment" forum to provide feedback to others. I will not read your posts here until after my reviews are completed. You can see the list of reports here:

jcflowers1.iweb.bsu.edu/rlo/510sp2009students.htm#Assessment

(PS. Your "Reflection Paper" is due by 11 pm on Monday, April 27th.)

2. 16.1 Please complete the Course Improvement Survey found here by Monday, May 4th.

http://www.bsu.edu/inqsit/inqsit.cgi/flowers2/online?510sp09imp

This is an optional, anonymous survey and it is the last one I'll ask you to take in our class, but it is an important one. Your answers will help me improve the course for future students. I won't look at any responses until after final grades have been submitted. Also, there are no points associated with this activity.

3. Check your grades now. Contact the instructor immediately if there are any problems.

Please be aware that the TA grades have not yet been posted; I intend to post these and to send you an Email detailing my assessment by Monday, May 4th. If you find any problems with other grades, let me know now. You may still re-take any quiz to get a higher grade, but do that right away. The quizzes become final on May 1st. If you haven't aced them all, you've got me wondering why. Be sure not to visit a quiz after getting a 100% on it or you will erase your previous grade.

4. I suggest that each student keeps a digital copy of their own individual and team projects.

Some student may wish to use their work in a professional digital portfolio, or as examples to show students or employers.

5. Late work?

If anyone wants to submit overdue work, at a discount, so to speak, please be sure to get it to my by April 29th. (Some assignments, like the 3-week survey, cannot be submitted anymore.)

Final Class Session: Monday, May 4th:

I am spending April 27th to May 1st grading, as you might imagine. Even though I hope to have the grading done by May 1st, it could spill over into "finals week," which begins May 4th. I'll post a final note here and on the announcements page on Monday, May 4th, and I'll open the Final Forum on that day, and encourage you each to make good use of it to say your goodbyes to your online colleagues. (Technically, all classes are to "meet" during finals week, and we satisfy this by having that final forum (for saying goodbye) opening on May 4th.) This has been a challenging experience, to be sure, and we'll use these last few days to provide some closure.


Week 14: 4/20/09 - 4/26/09
Learning Activities: Checklist of Deliverables:
1. As a team, upload and proofread your Technology Assessment Report. Remember that all team members are responsible to guard against plagiarism, as noted in Lesson 1G. 9.3G. One person in the team should send the instructor an Email that lists the report's title, authors' names, and the Web address (URL) by 11 pm Eastern on Friday, April 24th. (60 points for the "group grade")
2. Complete the Week 6 Reflective Survey found here:

www.bsu.edu/inqsit/inqsit.cgi/flowers2?510sp2009p2

This is the same instrument used three weeks ago, but your answers now might be different. Filling it out will probably help you write your "reflection paper" listed below.

15.1. Now that we are in the sixth week of the TA activity, please complete the reflective survey by 11 pm Eastern on Friday, April 24th. Completing the survey will earn you 5 points, but your answers will not be used for other grading purposes. Be sure to press "Continue" to submit your answers.

Unlike our formative quizzes, this survey will only be "open" for a short time, so take it now. Also, the points will have to be manually input to the Blackboard Gradebook, so don't expect them to show up automatically. (5 points)

3. After your team's report has been submitted, write and submit a "reflection paper."

This should be your own thoughtful narrative that reflects on what was learned during this activity. What did you learn about technology assessment, about lawn technology, about environmental protection, about online collaboration, about government, and about yourself? This should be an honest account, however, evidence of learning will be a criterion in its evaluation. In addition, please very briefly include in your reflection an account of which areas of the report you authored, co-authored, or edited.

I hope to award full credit to each student for this reflection grade, so don't let me down. In the past, the equivalent of 2 to 3 pages has seemed sufficient for most students. Just honestly and thoughtfully reflect on the experience and your learning, and you can't go wrong. This is not a time for complaints or ratting out an unproductive teammate (though all comments are allowed); it is a time to reflect and to grow from that reflection.

9.3R.  Reflection papers are due by 11 pm EDT, Monday, April 27th, 2009. Submit your Reflection Paper to the instructor as an Email (not through the dropbox.) If you like, you can attach it as a Word document, or just include your text as the body of an Email message, with the subject line "Reflection Paper." (30 points)
What is yet to come?

During the week from April 27th to May 3rd you'll have a chance to see what the other groups have done - how they've approached the TA activity - and you can compare your strategies and findings to theirs. During that week, I'll ask you to verify your grades, and to take yet another survey, this one a "course improvement survey."

The following week is finals week, and the good news is that you'll be completely done in ITEDU 510. We do not have a final exam or any assignments other than a participating in a final form I'll open on May 4th for saying goodbye.

But now, its time to dig in. "Give as much care to the end as to the beginning, then there will be no failure," (Lao Tzu.)

Jim


Week 13: 4/13/09 - 4/19/09
Learning Activities: Checklist of Deliverables:
1. Complete your "Student-Identified Project / Individual Activity," as assigned in Lesson 3.2:

3.2: Individual Project

 

3.2. Please submit the appropriate materials to the instructor via Email to jcflowers1@bsu.edu by:

New Due Date: 11 pm EDT on Friday, April 17th. Please ignore previously announce due dates for this assignment.

Some students submit brief reports of their achievement of their objective by attaching a Word document, others submit a URL to a Web document they've created. If you have any questions about your activity, contact the instructor now. Please make sure that your submission contains your name and states the learning objective. (50 points)

2. Continue to work on Assignment 9.3. 9.3. The final report is due 11 pm Eastern, Friday, April 24th, 2009. The reflection paper is due by 11 pm Eastern on Monday, April 27th.
3. Please complete the evaluation of the instructor as noted below. Evaluation of Instructor.

All classes in the Department of Technology at Ball State conduct an anonymous instructor evaluation during this time, and Dr. Jim Jones from University Computing Services is conducting that evaluation for us this term. Please participate in this voluntary student evaluation of the instructor. No information will be connected with your identity, and the results will not be given to me until after final grades are posted. But your ratings and comments are very important.

This evaluation make use of the BSU Gradebook program, which you should access at www.bsu.edu/gradebook . Once you log in, you will see a list of all courses for which you are enrolled this semester. Then you should click on the name of our course and the evaluation link will be shown on the page that comes up. If you have trouble accessing it, you can contact Dr. James A. Jones at jjones@bsu.edu  or 765-285-1506.

This evaluation is very important. It is not primarily used for course improvement, but it is used by the Department Chair for information related to decisions about me:

  • Instructor's tenure
  • Instructor's promotion
  • Instructor's re-assignment to this course
  • Instructor's salary

Since I'm a tenured full professor (some pronounce that "fool professor"), only the last two areas apply. But your feedback is very helpful. During the final week of our class, I'll ask you to fill out a different survey that will give me information I need for course improvement. Frankly, surveying you at the 13th week is like asking how you like a movie when it is only 3/4 over. You are now engaged in what is likely a frustrating activity, and it seems misleading to gather data from you about the instruction prior to the culmination of that activity. But the timing is out of my hands.

Are You On-Track?

During this week, each team should probably do the following if you have not already done so:

  • Post drafts for each of the report's sections, probably doing the background info first, the policy sections next, and an executive summary last.
     
  • Give and receive feedback on drafts, rewriting as necessary.
     
  • Compromise. Sometimes there is a good piece of writing that gets cut out, or gets moved, or gets changed in a way the original author may not care for. However, this report should be unified, and that means that the parts should fit together into one harmonious piece, so some compromise is unavoidable.
     
  • Write more. There is a lot of writing to do if this report is to meet expectations. Even though it is not compared to a professionally written TA report, it will be the culmination of several graduate students who have been searching, reading, discussing, collaborating, and writing for six weeks.
     
  • Publish a draft of the team's report online.
     
  • Decide from whom you will solicit feedback. I suggest you try to get external feedback on your nearly-ready draft from some appropriate expert.
     
  • Remember to keep the cognitive dialog going. Post messages that are cognitively rich. Remember that 40% of your grade comes from these messages.

Reflection Paper

I suggest you do not write the "reflection paper" mentioned in this TA assignment until your team has submitted its final TA report. I'll give you more information on this reflection paper later.


Week 12: 4/6/09 - 4/12/09
Learning Activities: Checklist of Deliverables:
1. Continue to work on Assignment 9.3. Remember, the goal here is learning. 9.3. Technology Assessment:

The final report is due 11 pm Eastern Daylight Time, Friday, April 24th, 2009.  (150 points)

The reflection paper is due by 11 pm EDT on Monday, April 27th.

Our final "meeting" for ITEDU 510 will be Monday, May 4th, after which our class will officially have ended.

2. Complete your "Student-Identified Project / Individual Activity," as assigned in Lesson 3.2:

3.2: Individual Project

3.2. Please submit the appropriate materials to the instructor via Email by:

11 pm on Friday, April 10th.

New Due Date: 11 pm EDT on Friday, April 17th. Please ignore previously announce due dates for this assignment.

Some students submit brief reports of their achievement of their objective by attaching a Word document, others submit a URL to a Web document they've created. If you have any questions about your activity, contact the instructor now. Please make sure that your submission contains your name and states the learning objective. (50 points)

Are You On-Track?

Here are some friendly suggestions about what your team might be involved with this week. Your team's schedule might be different from this, but I'm hoping that providing these suggestions help rather than hinder.

Cognitive

  • Make sure you have sufficient background information to address the points in the award letter and to formulate your policy recommendations. Identify any needs for data you still have not found.
  • Be sure you have evaluated the sources of information, and identified contradictions.
  • Don't narrow your team's focus to the point where you've missed some of the areas noted in the award letter.
  • Begin to come to an agreement about which policy options to present in the TA report. As a team, entertain a long list of possible policy options, and narrow this down to ones to include in the report. This might require quite a bit of discussion, weighing pros and cons, repackaging, and voting.
  • Decide which technology assessment techniques are to be used (not by which ones are easy, but by what type of information the decision makers would need.)

Organizational

  • Decide on the format of the report.
  • Decide whose job it is to write each section of the report. It is no coincidence that there are the same number of team members as there are to be policy option chapters. But who writes which parts of the other sections?
  • Establish deadlines for different sections of the report to be submitted to the team.
  • Devise a plan that solicits feedback from all team members and from others, as needed, on the report's draft(s).
  • Determine how your team is going to coordinate the report, making sure it looks like it was written by a single person.
  • Determine whose job it is to post the report (or its sections) to the Internet as a single HTML page.
  • Determine who writes each policy option chapter.
  • If possible, establish your own due date for the report that is earlier than the due date in the award letter. Leave enough time to solicit, get, interpret, and make changes on external feedback. While this is optional, it can improve both your learning and the report.

Week 11: 3/30/09 - 4/5/09
Learning Activities: Checklist of Deliverables:
1. Continue to work in your Technology Assessment Team.  
2. Complete the Week 3 Reflective Survey found here:

www.bsu.edu/inqsit/inqsit.cgi/flowers2?510sp2009p1

 

11.1. Now that we are in the third whole week of the TA activity, please complete the reflective survey by April 5th. This should take 5 to 10 minutes, and it might give you some insight into your group work. Completing the survey will earn you 5 points, but your answers will not be used for other grading purposes. Unlike our formative quizzes, this survey will only be "open" during this week, so take it now and don't lose those 5 points. Also, grades are not recorded automatically, so I will record your credit in Blackboard after the due date.

3. Don't forget about the Individual Project based on the objective you wrote for Assignment 3.1.

3.2. Please submit the appropriate materials to the instructor via Email by:

11 pm on Friday, April 10th.

Are You On-Track?

You know, I'll spend a lot of time and effort when it comes to evaluating your discussions and your report. Oddly, there would have probably been an easier way to do this evaluation: I've found that the performance measures I use correlate fairly well with the frequency of cognitive comments posted to team forums. That is, those who post more (meaningful) comments about the subject (the links between technology and sedentary lifestyles, legislation, etc.) or the process of performing this technology assessment, and post more frequently, seem to be the ones who get the highest grades, and the ones who are the most satisfied with the value of this activity.

By this week, in general, a team that is on-track will likely have:

  • Established a group timeline, with milestones, resulting in a final report that will be ready a few days prior to the due date.
  • Posted many (50?) informational items linked to sources.
  • Discussed what goes into the co-authored introductory chapter, and started finding specialized information for it that has not yet been found.
  • Decided who writes which section of the introductory chapter, and how it is assembled and jointly reviewed.
  • Determined which team member is the one to post the report to their iweb account, and uploaded a single HTML page that contains the outline of the report (without pasting any text from MS Word.)
  • Thought hard about what policy options the team should forward, considering several different approaches to policy options, though the actual decisions of which options to include and who authors which option might be made this coming week.

Tips

Your team forum is, frankly, more important than the cognitive jobs forum. That is where the bulk of your discussion takes place. And there are plenty of instances where you will be making wonderful contributions to your team that don't happen to fit your assigned job. However, I'd like to again mention those jobs forums, since at this stage in the assignment, it is easy to avoid them. But be sure to visit your team forum often, and try to post often. You see, for this online collaboration to work, there has to be a lot of give-and-take dialog, and this means that the delays between the time you post and the time someone replies should be rather short.

Be sure you visit the Cognitive Jobs forum. Feel free to post comments and questions there. Share with others who have the same job. Did you "play your role?" Did you make it easy for me to find when you deliberately played that role, for example, by writing, "As the _____ (Summarizer, Possibility Generator, etc), I'd like to suggest..."?

  • If you are the Summarizer, did you make sure to post clear summaries of your team's progress, noting what has been agreed upon and what remains on the table? Did you post a summary of any synchronous meetings your team might have had?
  • If you are the Possibility Generator, are there multiple posts where you made a point to list a large number of possibilities (possible technologies to consider, possible legislation, possible alternatives to problematic technologies, etc.)?
  • If you are the Idea Connector, are there multiple posts where mentioned connections between ideas? Did you make connections between ideas from different teammates, between ideas from the literature and from your work, between ideas in the award letter and your discussion, and between parallel areas of investigation and your team's area?
  • If you are the Strategist did you help your team work out a plan for researching, for sharing ideas, and for reaching consensus? Does everyone have a good understanding of what the goal is, and of the different jobs of each teammate, including who is to look for certain types of information?
  • If you are the Inferencer, did you help your team uncover the assumptions in the award letter, or suggest who might be impacted by your report?

Week 10: 3/23/09 - 3/29/09

Are You On-Track?

Last week, all team members should have visited their team (and job) discussion board forum. But just visiting is not enough, you are a "lurker" unless you actually post comments.

Here are some tips for getting started:

  • Compare your plans to the statement of the assignment in Lesson 9.3 and the contract award letter it contains.
  • Provide information from cited sources to shed light on the problem; critique that information; suggest how the information might be used by the group.
  • Determine a plan of action that identifies specific tasks, individuals responsible for those tasks, and target due dates or milestones.
  • Think. This is the most important task, and it takes time. Please use the team forum as a tool to help you and your teammates develop well-reasoned plans and rationales. It is alright to disagree at times - in fact, it is necessary.
  • Bound the problem. (Check out Porter, et al., linked to Lesson 9B for more info.)
  • Identify the target audience. Options will be developed, but "options for whom?" Who will take the actions listed in your TA report? Look back at the award letter for the answer. And who is your client's target audience?
  • Gather much information. Organize it. Critique it. Summarize it. Piece it together. Look for implications, inconsistencies, opportunities.
  • After you look at the background information, determine writing jobs for the section on background information.
  • Identify a list of many possible options to consider for inclusion in the report. Only four are required in a four-person team, three in a three-person team, in addition to the do-nothing option. But before deciding which options to include, make sure you've entertained a list with sufficient variety.

You should have visited the forum associated with cognitive jobs. Posting there can be a neat way to turn this rather competitive activity into more of a cooperative learning experience.

Are you on track? Here's a way to see. Go back through the first week's discussion in your team forum and collect all of your own posts. Now count the number of times you've done each of the following, quoted from the "guidelines for working together" I posted in your team forum:

  • "Raise new propositions;
  • Provide evidence to support those propositions. (This may be reference to an authority, published research, reasoned observation, calculations, or other means);
  • Raise substantive challenges to propositions forwarded in the discussion board forum (These may include questions regarding validity, value, assumptions, implications, etc.);
  • Make connections across different posts to relate concepts;
  • Effectively use group process for solving problems and making decisions;
  • Ask for and give timely and substantive explanations (Is constructive feedback regularly given and received?);
  • Share resources;
  • Actively attempt to negotiate differences and build consensus; and
  • Assume the responsibility for your roles in the group."

That is exactly what I will do when I attempt to assign individual grades. This is a discussion-based activity, so please, help yourself out here by logging in often and engaging in a meaningful dialog. Online graduate classes are expected to take about 9 to 12 hours of work per week, so please give me the evidence I need to give you the grade you want - show me that you're putting some deep thought into this project. Everyone in our class should post more frequently, discussing the issues raised.

Please also remember to provide evidence that you are playing your assigned cognitive role. I suggest you even use phrases like, "As the strategist, I'd like to...." I will collect all of your messages and try to find that evidence myself. I'll look for how many times you provided meaningful input both in keeping with your job, and in other areas, during our first week, during our second week, etc.

Note: I will be attending the International Technology Education Association Conference in Louisville on March 25th through March 28th, so I won't have office hours during that time. I do expect to have Internet connectivity when I return to my hotel, however, so feel free to contact me through the forums or by Email. Jim


Week 9: 3/16/09 - 3/22/09
Learning Activities: Checklist of Deliverables:
1. Read through the Technology Assessment Activity, now included as Lesson 9.3. If you don't see it, "refresh" the list of lessons, or just go to:
http://jcflowers1.iweb.bsu.edu/
rlo/510taassignsp2009.htm
9.3. Please begin initial work on the Technology Assessment Activity, as instructed. You have been assigned to a team, and you have been given a special "cognitive job" concentration in that team, although you should negotiate group tasks with your team members. Please begin the conversation on this activity now by posting early and often to your team's discussion board forum. The final report is due 11 pm Eastern Daylight Time, Friday, April 24th, 2009.  (150 points)

The goal here is to learn by participating in an online collaborative technology assessment, and this is more important than the writing of a report. Please log on to your team's forum early and often - there is a lot to discuss. Use that discussion board forum as the main area for your work, rather than working independently and posting individual results. This is a team project, so try to think with each other online.

[I decreased the font size this week in an effort to make this not "seem" like so much. ;-)    ]

2. In Blackboard, click on the new "Group" button. You have been assigned to a team and to a specific job concentration on that team (Inferencer, Summarizer, etc.) Therefore, you should see group area for both your team and for general discussion about the cognitive jobs. Click on your team's group area and enter its discussion board forum; read the instructor's initial note "Guidelines for Learning Together." You will use your team's discussion board forum for nearly all of your work on the technology assessment activity. The other forum (Cognitive Jobs) is intended to allow you to discuss your job concentration with others who have the same concentration on competing teams here. (Gee, are the teams competing? That's up to you. [hint])

Talk through the assignment on your team's discussion board forum.

3. View Jim's Advice on a short video file:
http://jcflowers1.iweb.bsu.edu/rlo/
video/510taintro02.wmv
4. An Optional Breeze / Acrobat Connect Meeting

I've decided to hold some "online office hours" next Monday night to answer questions you might have about the technology assessment activity, your assigned groups, your individual project, that usability research, or just to chat about our class. These are strictly "optional," so you need not attend, though I hope you do. It will give us an opportunity to use live video communications. However, please do not wait for that meeting before getting started in your group forums. Go to those forums now and get the conversation going.

  • 7 pm, EDT, Monday, March 23, 2009

I will enter the "room" 10 minutes before the start time. That is a good time for us to work out technical difficulties. Before logging in, please review Lesson 1E at http://jcflowers1.iweb.bsu.edu/rlo/breeze.htm. Then, just before the meeting starts, browse to the room at:

http://interactive.ihets.org/r91508743/

and click the button to enter as a guest

A broadband connection is required for this to work. You can participate by listening and typing in comments if you have a computer with a broadband connection and either a speaker or headphones. If you have either a mic or a video camera on your computer, you can participate by sharing your voice and your image, as well. We can also use a whiteboard, share applications, and "push links" to each other.

I will be in my office for these sessions, where the phone number is 765-285-2879.

Are You On-Track?

By now, everyone should have taken the Mod 9 quiz and posted their two formal messages for Assignment 9.2. Within the next two days, you should also have posted to the team discussion board forum. Typical postings may include introductions (backgrounds, strengths, interests related to the report), initial informational needs, coming to an agreement over the problem, discussion of the assignment, comments on others' postings, and initial task assignment of team members.

Don't forget about your Individual Project

Although the emphasis is now on the Technology Assessment activity, please do not procrastinate on your individual project, the one that aligns with the objective you wrote for Assignment 3.1. Please send me Email if you'd like to discuss it.

(Please note that we'll use this "Weekly Assignments" page as a way to let you know if you're progressing on schedule. There will also be future notifications here about taking two very brief but required surveys worth an additional 10 points, and reminders of due dates.)


Week 8: Assigned: 3/2/09, Due: 8 pm, Monday, 3/16/09
(Spring Break is 3/8 - 3/15)
Learning Activities: Checklist of Deliverables:
1. Complete Module 9. This is our last module in ITEDU 510. It covers technology assessment techniques by separating out 18 of those techniques into a lengthy but topical sub-module. Do not get intimidated, just read the basic material enough to ace the quiz and you've done enough. 9.1. Please take the formative Mod 9 quiz by March 16th. Refer to both information from Mods 8 & 9. (20 points)
2. Practice Two TA Techniques. Please read through Assignment 9.2 and  the TA techniques, then do a lot more searching and reading to teach yourself how to do your two assigned techniques the best you can. Contact the instructor as needed, and feel free to post questions, etc., to the Mod 9 forum. Try to learn the technique through your own searches and the readings they uncover. 9.2. As noted, please post messages to the appropriate threads in the Mod 9 Forums by March 16th to:
  • Discuss each of your assigned techniques;
  • Post examples and explanations of each of your assigned techniques.

(25 points)

 

3. Take a break during Spring Break

It really is important to take a vacation every now and then. For some in our class, your work vacation does not match your BSU vacation. ITEDU 510 is on break from Sunday, March 8th, 2009, through Sunday, March 15th, 2009. You are welcome to engage in the course materials, communicate on Blackboard, and work on your reports during that time, but it is not expected. I, for one, will be in Florida, trying to stay as far away from a computer as possible. That means that if you have questions on Assignment 9.2, try to ask them prior to Spring Break. Thanks.


Week 7: Assigned: 2/23/09,  Due: 11 pm 3/1/09
Learning Activities: Checklist of Deliverables:
1. Complete Module 8. This is an introduction to Technology Assessment.

There is only one deliverable, a discussion board forum posting.

8.1. As instructed in Lesson 8.1, select an OTA Technology Assessment report; post a note to the Module 8 Discussion Board Forum that includes a clear and concise original summary, and a brief critique. You many not select a report critiqued by another student, or critiqued in the Lesson 8.1 examples. Please avoid the temptation to write something shallow - delve deep in both your summary, and your critique. Take your time and put some thought into this. (10 points)
2. Check out your classmates' usability research reports. Feel free to comment in the Mod 5 forum. This is entirely optional, and no student comments here will influence the grade of these reports. You can see the listing of all reports here.

By the way, there are some who will submit their work after the deadline, and you might need to go to their message in the Mod 5 forum to see the URL to their work. I'll update that list before long.

Whose Spring Break?

ITEDU 510 follows Ball State University's schedule for Spring Break, not one of the many public school schedules of those in the class who may be teachers. Our spring break is from Sunday, March 8th, 2009, through Sunday, March 15th, 2009.


Weeks 5 - 6: Assigned: 2/9/09,  Due: 11 pm 2/22/09
Learning Activities: Checklist of Deliverables:
1. Complete Module 7, which covers other research on using technology, specifically user surveys, along with instructions for users.

(This is not a very big module. Students have two weeks here because of the Usability Research Report that is also due on February 22nd. Earlier submissions are encouraged. Those doing user surveys for their usability research should dwell on Module 7; however, students who are performing usability tests are advised to read through the module rather briefly and to concentrate on their usability test - just make sure you get a 100% on the Mod 7 quiz.)

7.1. Please take the formative Mod 7 quiz. (10 points)
5.1. As mentioned in Week 3, this class has three major projects, and the Usability Research Project report is one of them. It is due, as a published Webpage, by 11pm on February 22nd. (100 points)

Week 4: Assigned: 2/2/09,  Due: 11 pm 2/8/09
Learning Activities: Checklist of Deliverables:
1. Complete Module 6 which is an introduction to Web page creation and publishing. (You will be required to publish your usability research report on the Internet by February 22nd. Module 6 is an attempt to give you some practice and background with Web page creation prior to this date.) 6.1. Create an original Web page, publish it to the Internet, and post a message to the Module 6 Discussion Board Forum that lists the URL (i.e. Internet address). (10 points)

For minimal requirements of the page and message, see Lesson 6.1.


Week 3: Assigned: 1/26/09,  Due: 11 pm 2/1/09
Learning Activities: Checklist of Deliverables:

1. Complete Module 5, which is an introduction to usability research.

(In Week 4, Module 6 will cover Webpage creation and publishing.)

5.1. This class has three major projects, and the usability research project is one of them. It is due, as a published Webpage, by 11pm on February 22nd. (100 points)

You are encouraged to share your research idea with the instructor (via Email) as soon as possible.

5.2. Please take the formative Mod 5 quiz by 11 pm February 1st. (10 points)
2. If you have received comments on a proposed individual course objective for Assignment 3.1, but not yet received approval, please continue the negotiation. 3.1. If not yet approved, continue to negotiate a course objective (5 points on first submission [3.1A] and 5 points when an objective is eventually approved [3.1B], which may be weeks later.)

Week 2: Assigned: 1/18/09,  Due: 11 pm 1/25/09
Learning Activities: Checklist of Deliverables:

1. Complete Module 3, which explains how to develop your own course objective, and propose it to the instructor using Blackboard's digital drop box.

Please do not work on Assignment 3.2 until your proposed course objective has been approved.

3.1. Propose a personalized course objective and submit it using the digital drop box. (5 points on first submission [3.1A] and 5 points when an objective is eventually approved [3.1B], which may be weeks later.)
3.2. Please submit the appropriate materials to the instructor via Email by:

11 pm on Friday, April 10th.

Some students submit brief reports of their achievement of their objective by attaching a Word document, others submit a URL to a Web document they've created. If you have any questions about your activity, contact the instructor now. Please make sure that your submission contains your name and states the learning objective. (50 points)

2. Complete Module 4, for a somewhat skewed view of product usability and user-centered design. Feel free to add unsolicited comments and discussions to the Module 4 Discussion Board Forum. 4.1. Use anthropometric data to collaboratively develop a solution for the design problem described in Assignment 4.1. Post your thoughts, partial solution, explanations, challenges, etc., to the Module 4 Discussion Board Forum. (5 pts)
4.2. Take the Module 4 Quiz. You can find it on the Bb Assignments Page. You may retake it; each visit will erase your previous score. (10 pts)
Note

Ball State University, and this class, are not in session on Monday, January 19th in honor of Dr. Martin Luther King, his work, and his dream. Participants may still access web pages and Blackboard on this day if they like, but class is not in session. I am therefore posting this week's lessons the day prior to Martin Luther King Day.


Week 1: Monday, 1/12/09
 Due 11 pm on Sunday, 1/18/09
Learning Activities: Checklist of Deliverables:

1. Complete Module 1, which covers some Internet basics. You can access it through the button at the top of this page. Follow the directions in Module 1 to do each of the three required tasks at the right.

(Click here to open the modules page for the first two modules only in a new window.)

(Note, it can take a day or two after an enrolled student gains access to the Blackboard Website, so just be patient if you've enrolled in the last two days.)

1.1. Make the changes necessary to read Email sent from within Blackboard. I will send you an Email during our first week to verify this change; if you do not receive it, please let me know.
1.2. Post a bio message to the Module 1 Discussion Forum, as directed. (5 pts)
1.3. Complete the Online Student Profile, which will help the instructor to better suit your needs. Clicking the above link opens the profile in a new window. Be sure to click the "continue" button when you are done. (5 pts).
2. Complete Module 2, our introductory module, including the external reading.  Follow the directions to post to the Module 2 Discussion Forum (2.1 and 2.2.) 2.1. Post an original story as a reply to the Module 2 "Students' Stories" discussion board posting. (5 pts)
2.2. Post a comment on any Module 2 story or reading to the Module 2 discussion board. (5 pts)

All information is subject to change without notification.
Spring
, 2009 © Jim Flowers
ITEDU 510: Technology: Use & Assessment
Department of Technology, Ball State University